Create. Review. Keep the record.
Start with a brief or bring content you already have. Either way, the relevant rules and evidence stay with the work through to the final decision.
- 01
Create
A stronger first draft, shaped by the relevant rules and evidence.
- 02
Review
Clear findings, linked sources, and practical changes.
- 03
Record
The content, evidence, findings, and human decision together.
Start with a brief or content you already have.
Paste copy, upload a document, submit a public page, or review an image ad. Add the product, audience, and channel context that changes the answer.
Forecast needs balanced context
Risk disclosure present
Future return claim lacks support
Two ways to work. One accountable record.
Create and Review use the selected specialist model and the context you supply. The rules, evidence, findings, and reviewer actions stay with the work.
Create from a controlled brief
Set the audience, channel, objective, product facts, and supporting evidence before the first line is written.
- Format
- Paid social
- Audience
- UK retail
- Product
- Stocks and shares ISA
- Required fact
- Capital at risk
Make this year's ISA allowance part of your longer-term plan. Investment values can fall as well as rise...
Review before publication
Check copy, documents, public pages, emails, and image ads before they go live.
Build your future with our Growth Portfolio. It is expected to deliver 8% annual returns.
Future return claim lacks support
COBS 4.6.7 · COBS 4.2.1
From 30 minutes to about 30 seconds.
A source-linked first pass, ready for human judgement.
The decision stays with the work.
Redcliffe brings the claim, relevant sources, findings, and reviewer actions together. Your authorised reviewer decides what happens next, and the reasons stay attached.
- Claim checked
- Expected 8% annual returns
- Cited basis
- COBS 4.6.7 · COBS 4.2.1 · FG24/1
- Issue and change
- Unsupported forecast returned for revision
- Reviewer action
- Returned for revision · Reviewer note attached
Confidence isn't a feeling. It's a record.
Every decision should be understandable later. Redcliffe keeps the relevant model, sources, findings, reviewer actions, and outcome with the content—even as the rules move on.
The model used
The selected model and dated release stay attached to the work.
The sources behind it
Findings link back to the rules and evidence that support them.
The reviewer actions
Changes, comments, reasons, and open questions remain visible.
The final decision
A later model release does not rewrite an earlier decision record.
The same compliance intelligence, whether the work starts with a person or an agent.
Work in Redcliffe, bring changed pages back into Review, or connect authorised agents. The same rules, evidence, and human decision boundary apply.
Workspace
People Create and Review directly inside projects and sessions.
Website Monitoring
Discover candidate public pages, then route meaningful changes on selected pages back into Review.
Agent Gateway
Authorised agents can submit Create and Review work and return the result to the same accountable record.
Website Monitoring and Agent Gateway are enabled only for entitled accounts and agreed scopes. They do not publish or approve content.
Discuss a connected workflowBring one promotion. See what Redcliffe gives back.
We'll show you the strongest version your evidence and the rules can support, what still needs human judgement, and the record that remains.